Browsing Tag

putting the social in social media

Is Social Media History? The Story of Us, In 140 Characters or Less

“Quickly getting addicted to her Blackberry! Help!”

That brief blast from the past was featured in the Huffington Post’s article, Oldtweets Shows You Twitter Posts From 2006 That You’d NEVER See Today. It’s joined by 19 other tiny tales, each remarkably dated, discussing everything from what a great movie Snakes on a Plane was to pondering how anyone named Barack Hussein Obama could become President of the United States of America.

While the article’s good for a few laughs (some of which, it must be admitted, you’ll have to explain to the younger interns) there’s more value to be found in the questions it raises. Social media’s fast pace and global reach have a tendency to obscure the very real role platforms like Facebook and Twitter have in both recording our collective history and shaping our future.

The Exchange of Ideas

Matt Ridley, author of The Rational Optimist, discusses how humanity is unique in one critical way.  Unlike any other species on the planet, we become more prosperous as we become more populous.  This is just not true for the rest of the animal world.  Too many individuals tends to lead to catastrophic events, like over-consumption of resources that results in massive die offs.  Humanity, however, seems to have sidestepped at least some of these consequences. That’s not to say we live in a perfect world, where no one suffers. However, the rates of suffering are significantly less than one would expect, minus one critical factor.

According to Ridley, the reason humanity thrives is because we’re adept at exchanging ideas. Individuals talk with each other, and through this conversation, each benefits, adapting what they’ve learned to best suit their own circumstances.  The ability to exchange information allows people to specialize and work collaboratively with others who have different specializations to perform feats of creation no one individual could do alone.

What we’re seeing happen now, on social media platforms, is the escalation of the exchange of ideas to a speed never before possible in human history.  We’re also seeing unprecedented feats of creative collaboration being used for everything from simple entertainment to social commentary to sweeping cultural change.

The exchange of ideas shapes everyone involved. Participants in the exchange, the audience to the exchange, and a tertiary level of people who may never even know the initial exchange happened, but find themselves facing a social or cultural environment suddenly different as new ideas become part of the collective understanding of what it means to be a human being on this planet right now.

Social Media and the Role of Branding

As brand managers, we need to be  aware of the fact that these conversations are happening, and what role we take within them. Some brands are the equivalent of thought leaders, steering and shaping the conversations that surround them. Other brands are more passive, reacting to conversations they witness. That’s bad, frankly, but even worse are those organizations that remain almost willfully oblivious to the fact that these exchanges and resulting cultural changes are even happening. When these brands proceed as if the world they’ve always known has remained unchanged, they inevitably find themselves in the middle of social media firestorms.

It takes a certain amount of courage and faith in one’s leadership ability to look at your brand and assess, with objective eyes, how well you’re functioning in the current social media environment. Will your brand be tomorrow’s throwaway “ha-ha, remember when?” joke, or will you be central to the current conversation, participating in and benefiting from the exchange of ideas?

Playing Chicken With Your Brand: The Need for Authenticity

If we ever needed an illustration of how social media has changed the dynamic of corporate communications, we need look no further than Chick-fil-A.

It’s no secret that the leadership of the quick-service chicken chain is openly hostile towards same-sex marriage; they donate millions of dollars to anti-gay organizations. Dan Cathy, son of the founder, uses what he calls Biblical principles to run the business. The restaurant is not open on Sunday; they operate debt-free.

How does this play out on social media?

Putting the Social in Social Media

We talk a lot here about the need to belong, and why participating in groups is so important to people. Right now, let’s talk about the mechanics of how people get into groups in the first place, and what they do to stay well-positioned in the group, once they’re in.

Groups are formed by affinity; like-minded people gravitate toward each other. One way for the individual to be welcomed into the group is to announce they have the same values and beliefs as the rest of the group. Chick-fil-A does an exceptional job articulating its organizational values to the public. Customers who find these values in alignment with their own will favor Chick-fil-A. Customers who find these values counter to their own obviously will not.

Social media provides the platform where groups form and engage with each other. After Dan Cathy’s statements confirming the organization’s committed negative stand on same-sex marriage, the Jim Henson Company decided it no longer wanted to work with Chick-fil-A. They made their decision public on Facebook.

In response, the next day, Chick-fil-A posted paper signs in their franchises, announcing Jim Henson toys would no longer be available at Chick-fil-A due to a mysterious safety recall.

That’s the type of incredible coincidence the internet just loves. Gossip and speculation flew faster than the speed of light. There are countless articles, blog posts, and social media postings questioning the sincerity of this voluntary recall. Chick-fil-A did not present as credible. The bad impression compounded when it became obvious that someone was manufacturing sock puppet Facebook accounts to defend the brand.

It did not help matters that the Consumer Safety Protection Commission has reported no known safety issues with the puppets.  The CSPC is the governmental agency that usually handles this sort of thing.

It’s hard to be taken seriously as an organization guided by Biblical principals when you look like you’re bearing false witness. This, more than anything, is what may do real, lasting damage to Chick-fil-A’s brand equity. People believe what they believe about equal rights for all: a chicken restaurant is not going to change their mind—no matter how good those Waffle Fries are!

But now an element of doubt has been introduced into the equation. Chick-fil-A’s biggest fans (the people we’d call their Brand Lovers: the most profitable, engaged customers) and those who are favorable toward the brand are faced with uncomfortable questions.

An Alignment of Values

Were they lied to? And if they were, why? The customers who adhere to this brand and its values are not people who would leave over a forthright statement that acknowledged that the chicken restaurant parted ways with the Jim Henson company over political differences.  Lying is bad enough.  Lying for no discernible reason is worse.

Not every Chick-fil-A customer will ask these questions.  But some of them will, and they’ll talk to their family and friends. Brands are built on trust between the customer and the organization. There is a vital and critical sense that the values of the brand are in alignment with those of the the customer.  Right now, Chick-fil-A’s knocked the cart right off the rails. Even if they’re not lying, it looks like they are.

It’s obviously a tumultuous time at the company. Don Perry, VP of Public Relations, recently died. To move forward, especially in the arena of social media, it’s essential that the brand focus on bringing its actions back into alignment with the values their customers know and expect. Honesty is the best policy. And in today’s fast paced social media environment, verifiable honesty is even better.

What do you think? What advice would you give Chick-fil-A as they move forward?